Posts by s.hatfield

Truck Accident Liability

Posted by on Jan 24, 2013 in Injury Law, Juris Doctor, Pre Law Overview, Truck Accidents

Large commercial trucks, such as semi-trailers and 18-wheelers, garbage and dump trucks, and flatbeds, are a critical part of America’s transportation economy. Without the availability of these Truck Accidentforms of transport, commerce across the country would be severely limited, reducing the ability of the American economy to grow and prosper. Unfortunately, because of their considerable size, these vehicles also pose substantial health and safety concerns to other motorists on the road.

In recognition of this fact, large commercial trucks are far more heavily regulated than other types of vehicles. For instance, federal hours of service regulations strictly limit the amount of time that truck drivers may spend consecutively, or within a given timeframe, operating their vehicles. These regulations are meant to ensure that overworked, tired drivers aren’t allowed on the road, reducing the potential damage to others on the road.

In reality, of course, these regulations are often overlooked, both by drivers themselves and by companies which seek to improve their performance by keeping their drivers on the road as long as possible. In fact, some studies have suggested that as many as 50% of truck drivers are often in violation of these regulations, in spite of strict enforcement mechanisms. This can lead to serious accidents occurring when tired, inattentive drivers lose their focus and strike other vehicles.

In these circumstances, liability for the accident may be assessed to either the driver or the company, or it may be assessed to both of them. In 2012, for instance, the FMSCA, which oversees trucking companies’ operations, shut down a Kansas trucking company that was shown to have allowed its drivers to willfully misreport their hours on service logs. Any accidents occurring as a result of this type of reckless behavior could leave both drivers and the company liable for damages.

Trucking accidents can also occur when companies choose to implement deficient hiring or training procedures. Because trucking companies are liable for the actions of their employees, and least to an extent, they must ensure that their drivers are adequately prepared for the job. Yet many companies fail to institute these types of policies, allowing dangerously unprepared drivers on the road. In these circumstances, the company will almost always be liable for any accidents which may occur.

Drivers themselves may also be liable when accidents occur, particularly if they engage in risky behaviors such as driving while intoxicated or speeding. Finally, the manufacturers of commercial trucks may sometimes be held liable for accidents if vehicular failure is to blame. Depending on the circumstances, a smart truck accident lawyer can often determine exactly which party or parties should be held liable and pursue legal action accordingly.

Learn More

Brain Injury Liability

Posted by on Jan 16, 2013 in Brain Injury, Injury Law, Juris Doctor, Legal Doctrine, Pre Law Overview

The brain is the control center of virtually every essential process conducted by the human body, so even minor damage to this crucial organ can prove catastrophic. For the same reason, injuries to the brain can have dramatically divergent consequences, depending on the precise nature of Brain Injurythe injury and where in the brain it occurred. Some common consequences of brain injuries include loss of motor skills, loss of memory, stroke, emotional changes, suicidal ideation, cognitive deficits, and permanent disability.

Because of the considerable seriousness of these types of injuries, they are usually treated with the utmost concern from a legal perspective. In civil law, for instance, brain injury victims are often entitled to pursue compensation far beyond what the victims of other types of injuries might receive, because of the significantly greater range of negative effects which they may experience.

Liability for an individual’s brain injury is determined largely on the basis of how the injury occurred. Many of these types of injuries result from traumatic accidents, such as vehicular crashes. In Georgia, for instance, a man who was severely injured in an accident with a large tractor-trailer sustained life-altering brain injuries. He pursued legal action against both the driver of the vehicle and Georgia-Pacific, the trucking company which owned the vehicle, eventually settling for an undisclosed sum to help pay for the damage he had endured.

Brain injuries also may occur in medical settings, either as a result of poorly performed surgery, improper administration of anesthesia, incorrect pharmaceutical prescriptions, or for a multitude of other reasons. Individuals who suffer this type of brain injury are advised to pursue the assistance of Ritter and Associates, as this type of brain injury case often requires a very specific type of legal know-how in order to be properly represented.

The recent class-action lawsuit filed against the NFL by as many as 2,000 former players is another clarifying example of the ways in which liability for brain injuries may be assessed. Though the case has yet to even reach the trial stage, the allegations made by the players make clear the basis for which they believe the NFL should be held liable for injuries to their brains: because the NFL was aware of scientific evidence demonstrating the serious harm that concussions can cause, but failed to make this danger clear to the players, they allege, the league should therefore be held accountable for medical bills and other damages they may have suffered. Many retired players have suffered mental illness after some time out of the league, with depression and suicide not being uncommon among them.

Learn More

An Overview of American Medical Malpractice Law

Posted by on Jan 13, 2013 in Injury Law, Legal Doctrine, Medical Malpractice, Pre Law Overview

All licensed medical professionals have a responsibility to provide care and treatment to their patients that comports with the standards expected of their industry. Unfortunately, not all medical practitioners meet this standard. When this occurs, it can often leave patients suffering from Medical Malpractice At Argosyserious consequences that may affect them for the rest of their lives. In legal terms, this type of incident is known as medical malpractice.

Medical malpractice is a serious problem in the United States, with preventable medical errors ranking as one of the top causes of death in the country. Non-fatal instances of medical malpractice, which cannot be neatly quantified in the same way that fatal forms of this problem can be, are an even larger problem on the order of several magnitudes.

While the ability to fully compensate for the challenges that medical malpractice may pose in a victim’s life are often considerably diminished in our legal system, medical malpractice lawsuits nevertheless can help to restore at least some of the losses that a patient may suffer. A brief examination of several notable medical malpractice cases in the United States can help to give a more detailed understanding of the legal apparatus in place for resolving this issue.

Medical Malpractice: A Case-Based Examination

One of the most high profile instances of medical malpractice in recent memory involved the popular singer Michael Jackson, who died as a result of a prescription-drug overdose. While many initially assumed that it was the singer’s own abuse of the drugs which led to his death, the coroner who examined Jackson’s body decided that the death occurred not as a result of improper use of any one drug, but rather as a result of an unsafe combination of different prescriptions which had been provided by Jackson’s physician. Jackson’s father currently has employed a team of medical malpractice attorneys to pursue a suit against the physician, as well as the producers of the pharmaceuticals.

Another well-known instance of medical malpractice involved the actress and singer Julie Andrews. Andrews opted to undergo a routine surgery to remove nodules from her vocal cords, a procedure which should have had no lasting effect on her singing voice. However, errors during the course of the surgery dramatically limited her vocal range and left her unable to sing at all for years. As a result, she filed suit against the physicians who performed the operation, eventually settling for an undisclosed sum.

Learn More

Corporate Wrongful Death Lawsuits

Posted by on Jan 7, 2013 in Injury Law, Juris Doctor, Pre Law Overview, Wrongful Death

Wrongful death claims are a type of civil suit which can be brought against those who, directly or indirectly, contributed to the death of another individual, through actions or behaviors which fit the Funeral At Argosylegal standard of recklessness or negligence. These types of claims are often divided into two separate categories: claims filed against individuals, and claims filed against groups. Individual claims are often extremely varied in nature, but the vast majority of wrongful death cases brought against groups are directed against companies.

Wrongful death claims brought against corporate actors are, in fact, the only way in which the family of an individual who is killed as a result of a company’s actions can find the justice they deserve. From a legal standpoint, a company or corporation cannot be held criminally liable for any damages it may cause (though, in rare instances, corporate leaders may personally be subject to criminal charges), and therefore financial liability is the only form of punishment available for this type of wrongdoing.

Notable Instances of Corporate Wrongful Death Claims

Wrongful death claims against corporate groups have a long history in the United States’ legal tradition. An early example of this type of claim involved the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire, which occurred in New York City in the early 20th century. The factory, which was located in the upper floors of a cramped industrial building in downtown New York, caught fire in the late hours of the workday, and because one of the two exit doors was locked, hundreds of workers were trapped inside and burned to death. The victims’ families filed twenty-three separate civil suits against the factory’s owners, most of which were successful.

Another prominent wrongful death claim filed as a result of corporate negligence involved the Ford Motor Company’s Pinto model. The design of the fuel tank for this vehicle increased the likelihood that the tank would rupture and explode if involved in an accident, even a relatively minor fender-bender. More damningly, a memo obtained by several news agencies in the late 1970s revealed that not only was Ford’s management aware of the problem, but that they had decided that it would be more profitable to settle any legal suits which might later arise rather than fix the problem for each of the vehicles already in circulation. As a result, many of the suits eventually filed against Ford Motor Company resulted in substantially higher jury awards than might have otherwise been expected.

Corporate wrongful death lawsuits can also involved actions committed by individuals acting as agents of a corporation. For instance, a trucking accident lawyer representing the family of a truck accident victim may be able to successfully pursue compensation from the trucking company, rather than the truck driver responsible for the accident, if outside circumstances demonstrate that the company was in some way responsible for the accident’s occurrence.

Learn More